Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
Please respond only if you are a member of CLSA.
Thank you.
Thank you.
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. (My votes couldn't be accepted without a message?)
-
bruce hall
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:18 pm
- Location: huntington beach, orange county, california
-
Anthony Maffia
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 4:52 pm
- Location: Contra Costa County, CA
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
I fervently disapprove locking the entire forum to members only. Most discussions are about surveying, not the association. Why exclude out of state or non-member surveyors?
Also, many members have been using their PLS number as their forum user name. What is wrong with that? "Real Names Only" it is a freakish internet perversion encouraged and perpetrated by Facebook.
Lastly, while I'm ranting, it is about time the forum was allowed to be searched again by Google. The "robots.txt" file prohibiting indexing by search engines was a gut reaction to the dirty laundry posted last year. The soap opera is over, so kindly remove the restriction so I can find older posts using google instead of having to rely on the vastly inferior forum search feature.
Also, many members have been using their PLS number as their forum user name. What is wrong with that? "Real Names Only" it is a freakish internet perversion encouraged and perpetrated by Facebook.
Lastly, while I'm ranting, it is about time the forum was allowed to be searched again by Google. The "robots.txt" file prohibiting indexing by search engines was a gut reaction to the dirty laundry posted last year. The soap opera is over, so kindly remove the restriction so I can find older posts using google instead of having to rely on the vastly inferior forum search feature.
Last edited by Anthony Maffia on Tue Sep 22, 2015 12:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Edward M Reading
- Posts: 268
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 7:23 am
- Location: San Luis Obispo
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
Maybe I missed something. Is someone proposing to make the forum only viewable to members? Or is this a red herring?
Edward M. Reading, PLS (ID, WY, CA)
San Luis Obispo
San Luis Obispo
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
No red herring. Merely an inquiry, nothing more. Would welcome any thoughts.
-
RAM
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
- Location: Central Cal Mountains
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
seems like 39 votes indicates either there are very few members whom use this site or it is not that important to too. just an observation.
-
Anthony Maffia
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 4:52 pm
- Location: Contra Costa County, CA
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
Or everyone is busy.
- David Kendall
- Posts: 687
- Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2014 1:45 pm
- Location: Ferndale
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
I'm aligned with Anthony's post on this issue (at least his first two paragraphs, I have no opinion on the third.) I found this forum highly educational prior to becoming a member and it was a factor in my decision to join. After a few years I find it occasionally sad or even pathetic at times but still enlightening on most days. If I had no idea what the discussion was about, I can't imagine why I would choose to participate in it. I would say that the only reason to lock people out would be to possibly save ourselves from embarrassment.Anthony Maffia wrote:I fervently disapprove locking the entire forum to members only. Most discussions are about surveying, not the association. Why exclude out of state or non-member surveyors?
Also, many members have been using their PLS number as their forum user name. What is wrong with that? "Real Names Only" it is a freakish internet perversion encouraged and perpetrated by Facebook.
Or we could just consider what we are saying as professionals and how it would present to a potential client prior to posting, for a hairbrained idea. I reckon that John Q. Public would have to be awfully bored to try to synthesize a Stan Myron thread...
- Peter Ehlert
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 2:40 pm
- Location: N31°43', W116°39'
- Contact:
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
apparently this poll is now closed ... I can see the stats but can't vote.
Peter Ehlert PLS 5116 (retired)
-
wingding
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun May 10, 2015 9:04 am
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
I just voted 20 minutes after your post
-
JoeC
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 2:42 pm
- Location: Central Valley
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
I think another question could be:
How many people use this forum that are NOT a CLSA Member?
And why not?
How many people use this forum that are NOT a CLSA Member?
And why not?
Last edited by JoeC on Wed Sep 23, 2015 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
Peter, this should be open. It appears to be taking votes.
-
Proud7191
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:42 am
Re: Should the forum be for CLSA members only?
Michael said "Please respond only if you are a member of CLSA.
Thank you."
The nonmembers will not be represented! I thought we lived in a democracy :) Jp
Thank you."
The nonmembers will not be represented! I thought we lived in a democracy :) Jp