Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 4:04 pm
Dylan,
After talking with one of my mentor’s, he suggested that when the PE uses the ROW map and field evidence and decides to ACCEPT the found monument as defining the ROW, that is land surveying. I see your point Dylan that this analysis has already been done and hence the ROW map in the first place. On the other hand, each survey is the land surveyor’s professional opinion.
Why aren’t grading plans (with boundary and dimensions from fixed works to boundary shown) signed by land surveyors? Do you have to do a boundary survey for a grading plan? I don't believe that showing boundary lines on an exhibit is practicing land surveying (i.e. Tentative Maps, GIS, Grading Plans). I have yet to see a grading plan, improvement plan, site plan, erosion control plan, SWMP exhibit, etc with an LS stamp on it. Maybe this needs to change!
After talking with one of my mentor’s, he suggested that when the PE uses the ROW map and field evidence and decides to ACCEPT the found monument as defining the ROW, that is land surveying. I see your point Dylan that this analysis has already been done and hence the ROW map in the first place. On the other hand, each survey is the land surveyor’s professional opinion.
Why aren’t grading plans (with boundary and dimensions from fixed works to boundary shown) signed by land surveyors? Do you have to do a boundary survey for a grading plan? I don't believe that showing boundary lines on an exhibit is practicing land surveying (i.e. Tentative Maps, GIS, Grading Plans). I have yet to see a grading plan, improvement plan, site plan, erosion control plan, SWMP exhibit, etc with an LS stamp on it. Maybe this needs to change!