You don't need no stinkin' surveyor . . .

DWoolley
Posts: 1024
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:21 pm
Location: Orange County
Contact:

Re: You don't need no stinkin' surveyor . . .

Post by DWoolley »

LS9200 wrote: Tue May 27, 2025 8:19 am I don't recall mentioning GIS as the source for this, plenty of maps, right of way plans, and monuments have established coordinates on them or can be established from ancillary information. If you can't quantify the accuracy then it is a situation where more thorough survey would be required. There are plenty of situations where you can establish an expected accuracy from the previous work, not all situations. Again let the professional make the judgement. Also, Every time you do anything you accept responsibility and liability, use your judgment and make a professional call.
Suppose you have a recently filed map. The map mathematically closes 0.01'. A field survey puts coordinates on two monuments shown on the map. How accurate is the boundary?

Besides GIS, what is the incentive to do this process? What is the use case?

DWoolley
LA Stevens
Posts: 288
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am
Location: Marin County, California
Contact:

Re: You don't need no stinkin' surveyor . . .

Post by LA Stevens »

If you are preparing a topographic map that shows the boundary, you should tie and show the boundary monuments along those lines or any others that you found to determine your boundary. The existing boundary monuments are a feature of the topographic map.
LS9200
Posts: 44
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:32 pm

Re: You don't need no stinkin' surveyor . . .

Post by LS9200 »

DWoolley wrote: Tue May 27, 2025 12:20 pm
LS9200 wrote: Tue May 27, 2025 8:19 am I don't recall mentioning GIS as the source for this, plenty of maps, right of way plans, and monuments have established coordinates on them or can be established from ancillary information. If you can't quantify the accuracy then it is a situation where more thorough survey would be required. There are plenty of situations where you can establish an expected accuracy from the previous work, not all situations. Again let the professional make the judgement. Also, Every time you do anything you accept responsibility and liability, use your judgment and make a professional call.
Suppose you have a recently filed map. The map mathematically closes 0.01'. A field survey puts coordinates on two monuments shown on the map. How accurate is the boundary?

Besides GIS, what is the incentive to do this process? What is the use case?

DWoolley
I think you answered your own questions with the first statement, and the narrative discussed recently in this thread is the second.
User avatar
LS_8750
Posts: 1126
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:36 pm
Location: Sonoma
Contact:

Re: You don't need no stinkin' surveyor . . .

Post by LS_8750 »

On the topic of using judgement and making the professional call.........

The Plat is entitled "Boundary Exhibit"

Note 1 states: "THE PURPOSE OF THIS MAP IS FOR AN EXHIBIT AND THE CONTENT IS RELATIVE TO THE INTENDED USE." ..........

Well, ok.

Then Note 2 goes on: "THIS MAP DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A BOUNDARY DETERMINATION BY THIS SURVEYOR."......

The subject line is between two found original monuments, with no encroachments............

The WTF vibes are present on this one....
Post Reply