Stiffed on Surveys etc
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 12:13 pm
I light of that great thread about setting wood stakes and establishing boundaries, I thought I'd share a bit of Aggrevation.
Over the years of business, I have been "stiffed" for Surveys, in many ways.
Some simply cant Pay for the survey, others, get their stake with the yellow cap, and wont pay for a map, and even some have passed away.
Employing collection companies, may sometimes work, and I do that.
But meanwhile, I file the map on my own dime.
From this day forward, I want to title these as
RECORD OF SURVEY
FOR
"ME"
Now that being offered, I suppose it would be slanderous to make a note on the map stating that the client wouldnt pay.
Can anyone offer a history of why 8766 was written, and for what purpose ? And when was it intended for the local public agency to dictate your map, and also make more of a profit than the survey itself. ???
Filing a Record of survey, was to place on public record, the findings of retracement and noting of any discrepancies found.
It was a Public service by a private Surveyor and his client. NOT a taxable commodity. ?
I'd really like to know what the initial intent of 8766 was.
This is study material.
Over the years of business, I have been "stiffed" for Surveys, in many ways.
Some simply cant Pay for the survey, others, get their stake with the yellow cap, and wont pay for a map, and even some have passed away.
Employing collection companies, may sometimes work, and I do that.
But meanwhile, I file the map on my own dime.
From this day forward, I want to title these as
RECORD OF SURVEY
FOR
"ME"
Now that being offered, I suppose it would be slanderous to make a note on the map stating that the client wouldnt pay.
Can anyone offer a history of why 8766 was written, and for what purpose ? And when was it intended for the local public agency to dictate your map, and also make more of a profit than the survey itself. ???
Filing a Record of survey, was to place on public record, the findings of retracement and noting of any discrepancies found.
It was a Public service by a private Surveyor and his client. NOT a taxable commodity. ?
I'd really like to know what the initial intent of 8766 was.
This is study material.