Page 1 of 1
Record of Survey - Multiple Surveys
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 1:56 pm
by PE_PLS
Is there anything within the LSA that would prohibit the filing of multiple surveys within a county onto a single record of survey?
I've seen on several ROS where someone surveyed multiple non-adjacent lots that were in the same original tract and placed everything on a single ROS.
Is there any reason this couldn't be done, even if the surveys were miles apart?
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2010 3:08 pm
by pls7809
OC has a ton of older RS's that are divided in to four or six squares with separate surveys in each square. I guess the important thing would be whether it can be done legibly.
I worked on one in Huntington Beach for two different lots (separated by 5 or 6 lots) in one subdivision on one RS map. We were doing the survey for one lot and a guy came out of the house and asked us to include his lot and wrote us a check for us to get started and then we did his lot the same day. We hand-wrote a contract on field book paper and had him sign it.
I think it would be difficult to do legibly if the lots were miles away.
I would be curious the reaction of the county map checkers to something like this.
Posted: Sat May 01, 2010 7:36 pm
by land butcher
I would think if the lots are within the same block, I don't see how the CS could have any issue with it.
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 8:20 am
by Peter Ehlert
There is no restriction... just do it!
The choice is yours, it is Not the domain of the County Surveyor...
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 10:19 am
by RAM
tey them all together, why not?
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 3:29 pm
by mpallamary
This is exactly what happens when a geodetic control netwok survey is filed. File away.
Posted: Sun May 02, 2010 7:42 pm
by PE_PLS
Does it matter if the two surveys are related? Does there have to be the same basis of bearings? Does there have to be a tie between the two parts being surveyed?
Posted: Mon May 03, 2010 8:42 am
by PLS7393
My feeling is all lots shown on one R.O.S. shall be on the same Basis of Bearings. I have no problems with multiply lots, but they shall be tied together. If they are not tied together, aren't they two seperate records of a survey that you are showing what you did?