Cert of Compliance required for remainder?
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:10 am
I have the attached hypothetical situation. There is a Vesting Tentative Map approved for multiple units, consistent with the proposed unit subdivision map. The underlying property is Parcel 1 of a Cert of Compliance via a LLA. My client is looking to record the unit map in short order and then has a buyer lined up to acquire the remainder (being Parcel 1 excepting therefrom Tract 8100-1 in essence). There is a future public street which will bisect the remainder north-south and that is the reason the owner doesn't want to just lot that part out now on the first unit map; they want the future developer of the remainder to be able to subdivide that land.
Question #1: do you agree that the remainder, whether designated as such or not, is a legal parcel for sale? My interpretation of SMA 66424.6 says that it is.
Question #2: is a Certificate of Compliance required to make this remainder legal for sale?
Question #3: the City says they won't give a C of C because they want a subdivision map; are they incorrect to request this? My interpretation of SMA 66499.35 would be that they should be able to do so, at a minimum with Conditions. I find nothing in their Municipal Code to the contrary.
Thanks in advance for any input,
Mike.
Question #1: do you agree that the remainder, whether designated as such or not, is a legal parcel for sale? My interpretation of SMA 66424.6 says that it is.
Question #2: is a Certificate of Compliance required to make this remainder legal for sale?
Question #3: the City says they won't give a C of C because they want a subdivision map; are they incorrect to request this? My interpretation of SMA 66499.35 would be that they should be able to do so, at a minimum with Conditions. I find nothing in their Municipal Code to the contrary.
Thanks in advance for any input,
Mike.