Page 1 of 1
One Legal Parcel on 2 jurisdictions?
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 9:38 pm
by BoundaryMan
My client owns one legal parcel. Said legal parcel consists of 3 separate Los Angeles County tax parcels. Can this legal parcel falls into 2 Cities jurisdiction. City planning department said 2 of the tax parcels falls into their jurisdiction, while remaining tax parcel falls into next City's. As such, this project needs 2 Cities’ approval.
How can one legal parcel falls into 2 jurisdictions? Am I missing something?
Any input?
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:31 pm
by E_Page
Political subdivision boundaries don't necessarily follow individual parcel boundaries. It's not terribly common, but it's not all that rare either for portions of a legal parcel to fall partially in more than one political subdivision.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:33 pm
by Ian Wilson
What Evan said.
As I recall, there are a number of parcels that span across the Riverside/San Diego County line.
On legal parcel can have more than one tax number. One tax parcel can have multiple legal parcels.
one parcel in lumtiple political jurisdictions
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:50 pm
by marchenko
Parcels are legal if they come from a subdivision map or created by a legal conveyance. the political jurisdictions are neither grantor nor grantee so they don't affect the boundary of th elegal parcel
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:10 pm
by Keithwill
Yes, we have a lot in Los Angeles and the boundary line between LA and Culver City, runs through it. Has to be the dumbest way of establishing boundaries.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:05 pm
by Anthony Maffia
IIRC, the Emeryville / Oakland line runs through a Home Depot. Its approvals were delayed because Oakland required all cash registers to be on their side, so they'd get the sales tax. Emeryville wasn't impressed.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:00 pm
by Dave Karoly, PLS
my wife's Grandparents owned a house and lot in Healdsburg (near Santa Rosa) which straddled the city limit line. Part was in the City and part was in the unincorporated territory of the County of Sonoma.
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:33 pm
by land butcher
The LA/Orange county line runs thru the parking lot a retail building at the SE corner of Beach Blvd and Rosecrans. Shows up on google
County Line As Legal Line
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 6:01 pm
by BoundaryMan
land butcher wrote:The LA/Orange county line runs thru the parking lot a retail building at the SE corner of Beach Blvd and Rosecrans. Shows up on google
Is said County line a legal line?
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 8:35 am
by subman
There was recently a county boundary line adjustment between LA and Orange County to clean up issues related to inconsistencies between political boundaries and property ownership boundaries. It involved several cities as most of the land area covered incorporated city territory.
Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 4:43 pm
by land butcher
BoundaryMan wrote:Is said County line a legal line?
State water board considers it to be the dividing line between the counties. More than that I have no idea.