What am I missing?
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:41 am
Got up early to do some calcs for monument search and came upon a problem regarding two tracts. Both tracts were done by the same engineer, Mr. Fiztgerald RE 726.
The senior tract establishes Commonwealth Avenue in 1945, down to a section line. Monuments were found, set and noted.
The junior tract begins north of the section line and creates a new right of way, Lynnhaven Road, that bisects Commonwealth Avenue. This tract was done in 1946.
The problem is that the found/set monument calls for both tracts in the main area of Commonwealth are identical, BUT, and this is a big BUT, now Commonwealth has a 1.97 jog e'ly where Lynnhaven cuts through. Also, there is a 10 foot difference in a north / south direction.
I have gone over the calcs and for the life of me, cannot see what I have done wrong. The preamble of the 1946 tract does not mention, nor is there a note on that map, of a portion of Commonwealth being vacated, which would explain (maybe) the jog and 10 foot difference.
Here are the links of both tracts for those interested :
http://dpw.lacounty.gov/sur/nas/landrecords/tract/MB0263/TR0263-048.pdf
http://dpw.lacounty.gov/sur/nas/landrecords/tract/MB0271/TR0271-046.pdf
I have also attached a PDF of the problem area..
So, what the heck am I missing?? It has to be something simple!
The senior tract establishes Commonwealth Avenue in 1945, down to a section line. Monuments were found, set and noted.
The junior tract begins north of the section line and creates a new right of way, Lynnhaven Road, that bisects Commonwealth Avenue. This tract was done in 1946.
The problem is that the found/set monument calls for both tracts in the main area of Commonwealth are identical, BUT, and this is a big BUT, now Commonwealth has a 1.97 jog e'ly where Lynnhaven cuts through. Also, there is a 10 foot difference in a north / south direction.
I have gone over the calcs and for the life of me, cannot see what I have done wrong. The preamble of the 1946 tract does not mention, nor is there a note on that map, of a portion of Commonwealth being vacated, which would explain (maybe) the jog and 10 foot difference.
Here are the links of both tracts for those interested :
http://dpw.lacounty.gov/sur/nas/landrecords/tract/MB0263/TR0263-048.pdf
http://dpw.lacounty.gov/sur/nas/landrecords/tract/MB0271/TR0271-046.pdf
I have also attached a PDF of the problem area..
So, what the heck am I missing?? It has to be something simple!