Page 1 of 1

Utilization of existing easement.....

Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2013 3:11 pm
by steffan
or not.

Rye v Tahoe Truckee Sierra Disposal Co

Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2013 6:36 am
by Dave Karoly, PLS
This is useful:

"The interpretation of a written instrument is solely a question of law unless the meaning turns on a question of fact. In that case, a review of the facts is subject to the substantial evidence rule and if the evidence is in conflict we are directed to decide on the basis of the inference or inferences that support the trial court. (Parsons v. Bristol Development Co. (1965) 62 Cal.2d 861.) We proceed on that basis."

It is key in understanding Appellate opinions to understand the difference between a fact review (deference to the trial court) and a legal review (de novo, no deference).