Utility Research With AT&T
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2014 9:25 am
I'd like to know how my peers and mentors are handling AT&T facilities when they do underground utility mapping. On a recent topographic survey project AT&T told us they would charge $500 for their utility as-built information and they want us to sign a very strict non-disclosure agreement. I believe the strong terms in the non-disclosure agreement wouldn't let us show the utility facilities on our topographic survey, which sort of nullifies the point of obtaining the as-built plans.
This is a little irritating, as AT&T has their facilities located in the public right-of-way.
How are you handling this? Are you signing the non-disclosure agreement and paying the fee? If you do sign the non-disclosure agreement, do you show the AT&T facilities on your topo and distribute to your client? Do you simply inform the client that you won't include AT&T facilities in your survey product?
This is a city project, so I can have the city engineer put pressure on AT&T if I need to, but I wanted to see what other surveyors in California were doing first. I can't be the first person to deal with this issue.
Seems like an issue we may need to deal with at a professional society level...
Thanks for any advice or information.
Landon
This is a little irritating, as AT&T has their facilities located in the public right-of-way.
How are you handling this? Are you signing the non-disclosure agreement and paying the fee? If you do sign the non-disclosure agreement, do you show the AT&T facilities on your topo and distribute to your client? Do you simply inform the client that you won't include AT&T facilities in your survey product?
This is a city project, so I can have the city engineer put pressure on AT&T if I need to, but I wanted to see what other surveyors in California were doing first. I can't be the first person to deal with this issue.
Seems like an issue we may need to deal with at a professional society level...
Thanks for any advice or information.
Landon