Page 1 of 1

Weed Abatement Settled - It's not natural habitat...

Posted: Tue May 02, 2017 6:24 am
by Ian Wilson
Well. The argument that those weeds and :"stuff" are really just "natural habitat" for birds and other wild life just got stifled.

Sometimes, the cases just bring a grin to your face.

Not boundary related, but, enjoy none the less...

Re: Weed Abatement Settled - It's not natural habitat...

Posted: Tue May 02, 2017 9:14 am
by Warren Smith
It's astounding the extent that the late Mr. Diehl was unaware of, or complacent about, the Rules of Civil Procedure, and yet so adamant about due process ...

Re: Weed Abatement Settled - It's not natural habitat...

Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 7:36 am
by David Kendall
moral: Confucious say, Wise man buys lawnmower. Foolish man buys lawsuit

Re: Weed Abatement Settled - It's not natural habitat...

Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 10:47 am
by Pulley
Thanks for posting this, Ian. Our coastal environment certainly encourages "habitat creation" with a climate that encourages the berry briars and Scotch broom When I saw the name Diehl I thought it was an attorney we had worked with on multiple occasions, but this guy was only playing at being an attorney.

Re: Weed Abatement Settled - It's not natural habitat...

Posted: Wed May 03, 2017 3:57 pm
by land butcher
My parents bought a place in Silverado Cyn. One weekend they raked up all the leaves into piles and put all they could in the trash can and plastic bags but did not have enough plastic bags.
On monday they went into town to shop and when they returned home the piled, but unbagged, leaves were gone. About 2 weeks later they got a hefty bill from the County for fire hazard material removal.