Disappointed
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2022 2:42 am
I am disappointed with CLSA.
I write this report because, to a greater or lesser degree, these issues likely exist in every Chapter meeting. This does not mean that everything about CLSA is bad. Far from it. There are so many good things that CLSA has done. I am a 43-year member of CLSA. My first boss, the man who asked me to come down to his office one morning, which started my surveying career, was Robert Hilliard. He was a member of CLSA (LS 3976) and attended the meetings held in the Central Coast. I worked for Ben Maddalena, Terry Orton and then Tom Mastin, one of my mentors and to me one of the most respected Surveyors in California. Although he does not post on this forum, he is the leading surveying instructor at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and a long-time business owner.
I have been to Mike Pallamary's seminar and thoroughly enjoyed it. One outstanding highlight of my career was to listen to the beloved Roy Minnick, who with his accent from I don’t know where, spoke fondly of the State Lands Commission with which he was associated for a time. He introduced to me the most important statute, and I believe, the only statute at the time other than the LS Act, that directly references surveying and is the foundation to boundary surveying here in California. Walt Robillard, a noted lecturer, and dynamic at that, was fascinating and informative.
I attended a full day conference run by Jeffrey Lucas, the writer of The Pincushion effect. While I do not agree with all the principles in his book as pertaining to California, the discussion stretched my brain.Finally, I want to mention Dr. Fareed Nader of Fresno. When you heard him speak, you got to know that he had a love for the people he taught and the profession he enjoyed. He was a gifted speaker and included many humorous stories and anecdotes to help us remember his main points.
CLSA provides a forum such as this one to meet other surveyors, hear their expressions and respond. I will continue to post on this forum but I will do so through my good friend Eric Ackerman (Gromatici). Other benefits are that CLSA is a watchdog for surveyors. They publish California Surveyor magazine and provide a handy (although expensive) way to get the Subdivision Map Act, LS Act, etc.
Now for the bad news. I will be withdrawing my membership with CLSA. It’s true that I have not attended many local chapter meetings and I know I am judging the organization by those meetings. But this is my story. I recently attended a CLSA meeting. This was the second one I attended in 13 years. I had been a sporadic attender in another chapter. The meeting had a structure at first, then turned informal later. People spoke when they felt inclined to. When we were all conversing during the meeting I was answered with the phrase "Well before we go down a rabbit hole..." This was, I believe, the Secretary of the chapter. It seemed he was saying "That information is of little value and off topic" I acknowledge that I may have been talking too much.
I attended my third meeting with this chapter because I had been invited to speak there. My license is 5571 and my company specializes in boundary surveys. The subject was the unlicensed practicing of surveying by architects and others who use that data to prepare their site plans for submittal as construction documents. In the second or third minute of my talk, a long-time member of the group interrupted me and began speaking. It was either a question or a comment. I was shocked. I have given well over 150 public talks. At some of these there was an attendance of about 5000 people (Selland Arena Fresno, Bakersfield Convention Center). I have also given many shorter talks at local gatherings and have instructed LS Review Classes at CLSA meetings and other places. I have never been interrupted during a talk before.
I endeavor to speak the truth and understand the truth so I can convey it correctly to others. I may not be the most colorful speaker but I try to get my facts straight. I have been a member of a speaking school for 48 years. It’s a school that never graduates its students. They just keep getting better at public speaking and teaching.
Back to the meeting. My discussion was based on CBC 107.2.6. I have never seen this mentioned in any seminar, surveying book, the California Surveyor or any other place when discussing surveying. I came across this on my own while working with an organization that is one of the largest construction organizations in the world and which erects and maintains buildings in virtually every country in the world. I work sometimes for that organization here in California.
After my talk. but before the next talk (there were two speakers) one person in the audience decided to start a 20 minute non-stop verbal assault of my information and the LSACTS White Paper. He is a licensed surveyor and added that he had been a business owner since 1994. The White Paper was the subject of the second speaker. This individual spoke multiple times in the meeting and in similar fashion. I could not help myself but I had to speak up. I was visibly and inwardly upset. I questioned the process - who is in charge of this meeting? Why is this person going on and on, contradicting me and himself, speaking way off topic, trying to cover himself by misleading statements? The Secretary interrupted me and said that it was the Chairman's first time doing it. I apologized to the group as I was not aware of that fact.
After that I had to leave the meeting but I actually felt relieved to do so. I later wrote an email to the first-time chairman to let him know I appreciated his effort but the problem was that the meeting lacked structure and he had not received much training. There are certain ethical standards that makes a person feel welcome, appreciated and respected as an individual. I hope those principles can be emphasized so that embarrassing and damaging events like the one I experienced are minimized.
From a disappointed veteran.
I write this report because, to a greater or lesser degree, these issues likely exist in every Chapter meeting. This does not mean that everything about CLSA is bad. Far from it. There are so many good things that CLSA has done. I am a 43-year member of CLSA. My first boss, the man who asked me to come down to his office one morning, which started my surveying career, was Robert Hilliard. He was a member of CLSA (LS 3976) and attended the meetings held in the Central Coast. I worked for Ben Maddalena, Terry Orton and then Tom Mastin, one of my mentors and to me one of the most respected Surveyors in California. Although he does not post on this forum, he is the leading surveying instructor at Cal Poly San Luis Obispo and a long-time business owner.
I have been to Mike Pallamary's seminar and thoroughly enjoyed it. One outstanding highlight of my career was to listen to the beloved Roy Minnick, who with his accent from I don’t know where, spoke fondly of the State Lands Commission with which he was associated for a time. He introduced to me the most important statute, and I believe, the only statute at the time other than the LS Act, that directly references surveying and is the foundation to boundary surveying here in California. Walt Robillard, a noted lecturer, and dynamic at that, was fascinating and informative.
I attended a full day conference run by Jeffrey Lucas, the writer of The Pincushion effect. While I do not agree with all the principles in his book as pertaining to California, the discussion stretched my brain.Finally, I want to mention Dr. Fareed Nader of Fresno. When you heard him speak, you got to know that he had a love for the people he taught and the profession he enjoyed. He was a gifted speaker and included many humorous stories and anecdotes to help us remember his main points.
CLSA provides a forum such as this one to meet other surveyors, hear their expressions and respond. I will continue to post on this forum but I will do so through my good friend Eric Ackerman (Gromatici). Other benefits are that CLSA is a watchdog for surveyors. They publish California Surveyor magazine and provide a handy (although expensive) way to get the Subdivision Map Act, LS Act, etc.
Now for the bad news. I will be withdrawing my membership with CLSA. It’s true that I have not attended many local chapter meetings and I know I am judging the organization by those meetings. But this is my story. I recently attended a CLSA meeting. This was the second one I attended in 13 years. I had been a sporadic attender in another chapter. The meeting had a structure at first, then turned informal later. People spoke when they felt inclined to. When we were all conversing during the meeting I was answered with the phrase "Well before we go down a rabbit hole..." This was, I believe, the Secretary of the chapter. It seemed he was saying "That information is of little value and off topic" I acknowledge that I may have been talking too much.
I attended my third meeting with this chapter because I had been invited to speak there. My license is 5571 and my company specializes in boundary surveys. The subject was the unlicensed practicing of surveying by architects and others who use that data to prepare their site plans for submittal as construction documents. In the second or third minute of my talk, a long-time member of the group interrupted me and began speaking. It was either a question or a comment. I was shocked. I have given well over 150 public talks. At some of these there was an attendance of about 5000 people (Selland Arena Fresno, Bakersfield Convention Center). I have also given many shorter talks at local gatherings and have instructed LS Review Classes at CLSA meetings and other places. I have never been interrupted during a talk before.
I endeavor to speak the truth and understand the truth so I can convey it correctly to others. I may not be the most colorful speaker but I try to get my facts straight. I have been a member of a speaking school for 48 years. It’s a school that never graduates its students. They just keep getting better at public speaking and teaching.
Back to the meeting. My discussion was based on CBC 107.2.6. I have never seen this mentioned in any seminar, surveying book, the California Surveyor or any other place when discussing surveying. I came across this on my own while working with an organization that is one of the largest construction organizations in the world and which erects and maintains buildings in virtually every country in the world. I work sometimes for that organization here in California.
After my talk. but before the next talk (there were two speakers) one person in the audience decided to start a 20 minute non-stop verbal assault of my information and the LSACTS White Paper. He is a licensed surveyor and added that he had been a business owner since 1994. The White Paper was the subject of the second speaker. This individual spoke multiple times in the meeting and in similar fashion. I could not help myself but I had to speak up. I was visibly and inwardly upset. I questioned the process - who is in charge of this meeting? Why is this person going on and on, contradicting me and himself, speaking way off topic, trying to cover himself by misleading statements? The Secretary interrupted me and said that it was the Chairman's first time doing it. I apologized to the group as I was not aware of that fact.
After that I had to leave the meeting but I actually felt relieved to do so. I later wrote an email to the first-time chairman to let him know I appreciated his effort but the problem was that the meeting lacked structure and he had not received much training. There are certain ethical standards that makes a person feel welcome, appreciated and respected as an individual. I hope those principles can be emphasized so that embarrassing and damaging events like the one I experienced are minimized.
From a disappointed veteran.