Administrator,
Ah, it was just starting to get interesting.
DWoolley
Proposed Two-Person Crew Mandates
-
DWoolley
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:21 pm
- Location: Orange County
- Contact:
-
Administrator
- Posts: 459
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 9:55 am
Re: Proposed Two-Person Crew Mandates
One might even say it was getting fascinating...DWoolley wrote:Administrator,
Ah, it was just starting to get interesting.
DWoolley
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Peter Ehlert
- Posts: 717
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2003 2:40 pm
- Location: N31°43', W116°39'
- Contact:
-
rmaher
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:27 pm
- Location: Lake Forest, CA
Re: Proposed Two-Person Crew Mandates
argumentum ad hominem aside; an article to the point: http://www.pobonline.com/articles/98237 ... ing-safety
“With the advancement of technology, in many cases, that crew of four has been reduced to one. You’ve got a person who’s using robotics to actually do the survey, so you significantly reduce the opportunity for some of the younger folks to gain field experience and just practical experience; also to give them the opportunity to find out what the field is about.” Article
If you can't access the link, obviously someone doesn't want you to be able to.
Rich
“With the advancement of technology, in many cases, that crew of four has been reduced to one. You’ve got a person who’s using robotics to actually do the survey, so you significantly reduce the opportunity for some of the younger folks to gain field experience and just practical experience; also to give them the opportunity to find out what the field is about.” Article
If you can't access the link, obviously someone doesn't want you to be able to.
Rich
-
rmaher
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 4:27 pm
- Location: Lake Forest, CA
Re: Proposed Two-Person Crew Mandates
I was sent this article by CLSA member and am sharing.
Rich
Rich
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
Mr. Smith
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:44 am
- Location: Montague CA
- Contact:
Re: Proposed Two-Person Crew Mandates
Can we all agree this mandate is not for safety.
The u-tube CLSA audio was a good show, it is clear this
mandate is driven by the union for financial gain otherwise min wage observers
could be used for safety.
I heard over and over that some surveyors are pressured by clients to limit crew.
Dont work in the big city but still I have never been pressured by clients about
the number of crew I use, if fact clients appreciated that we are fully staffed and
get the job done on time.
This is a hot subject and would like to see the Member Numbers on where we stand with location and public or private info.
Brian
The u-tube CLSA audio was a good show, it is clear this
mandate is driven by the union for financial gain otherwise min wage observers
could be used for safety.
I heard over and over that some surveyors are pressured by clients to limit crew.
Dont work in the big city but still I have never been pressured by clients about
the number of crew I use, if fact clients appreciated that we are fully staffed and
get the job done on time.
This is a hot subject and would like to see the Member Numbers on where we stand with location and public or private info.
Brian
-
LS_8750
- Posts: 1166
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:36 pm
- Location: Sonoma
- Contact:
Re: Proposed Two-Person Crew Mandates
"Don't Mandate Me Bro."
I support all aspects of a minimum two person crew doing a job. For safety reasons, for boredom reasons, for mentoring, etc. I hate going out alone, I have nobody to laugh about but myself.
"Don't Mandate Me Bro."
I support all aspects of a minimum two person crew doing a job. For safety reasons, for boredom reasons, for mentoring, etc. I hate going out alone, I have nobody to laugh about but myself.
"Don't Mandate Me Bro."