Thanks California Surveyor

Post Reply
dmi
Posts: 981
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:42 pm
Location: San Francisco
Contact:

Thanks California Surveyor

Post by dmi »

The "Continuing Education Issue" is a great topic for discussion. I am left wondering about the level of voluntary participation in professional development. I know many registrants ,having licenses in multiple states are hungry for classes to satisfy the requirements to maintain good standing in the states where continuing education is mandatory. It seems to me that the bulk ofseminar attendees are those that are mandated to continue education. I wonder is this true?

I think we would be better off with a voluntary system, but the only way that is going to work is if we can get enough participants to show that a substantial number of license holders actually continue their education and a mandatory program is unnecessary.

I know I have fallen short in reporting my efforts to continue my efforts and surely other have as well.

i believe we need to take control of this situation or it will be controled for us as others have suggested.
Dane Ince, LS
Certified Federal Surveyor
415-321-9300
WWW.SanFranciscoSurveyingCompany.com
User avatar
PLS7393
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Bay Area (Fremont)
Contact:

Post by PLS7393 »

I agree with Dane on the great issue in the latest California Surveyor, another outstanding issue!

As for the Voluntary Professional Development Program through CLSA, I am a participating member, and it truly is not difficult to satisfy the requirements. Dane, I've seen you at the recent conferences, so go online and fill out the paper work, you'll qualify just fine, and it doesn't take that long!
Keith Nofield, Professional Land Surveying
PLS 7393
Post Reply