Proper method for measuring angle of intersection of two streets

Post Reply
User avatar
subman
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Ventura County

Is this what you are describing

Post by subman »

Please try to elaborate and provide another example if it is not. CL of tee street tends to be radial to curved CL to optimize sight distance at intersection. Lot lines along the curved street would tend to be radial to the CL curve with at least minimum lot width at the street side line. Corners lots would have unparallel lot lines. One being the street sideline, parallel to the tee street CL and the other being on a radial bearing to the curved street CL.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dennis Hunter, PLS & PE
Simi Valley, CA
User avatar
Jim Frame
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Post by Jim Frame »

Wouldn't the design geometry be defined by the two maps? It seems to me that an Assessor's Parcel Map is the wrong instrument to be looking at to solve the problem.

For what it's worth, a visual inspection of the AP map indicates that Broadway Terrace isn't radial. But the subdivision map (or whatever document created the Broadway Terrace ROW) would tell the tale, wouldn't it?

.
Jim Frame
Frame Surveying & Mapping
609 A Street
Davis, CA 95616
framesurveying.com
User avatar
subman
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Ventura County

Per our Zoning Ordinance

Post by subman »

-- Lot, Corner. “Corner lotâ€￾ means a lot or parcel of land situated at the intersection of two or more parkways, highways or streets, which parkways, highways or streets have an angle of intersection measured within said lot or parcel of land of not more than 135 degrees.


Try using the side line bearings S 70-38-45 E and N 36-41-35 W and I think you get an anle of 134-02-50 which would qualify as a corner lot in my opinion (i.e. not more than 135 degrees).

But then I am not a Planner...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Dennis Hunter, PLS & PE
Simi Valley, CA
User avatar
subman
Posts: 453
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:22 pm
Location: Ventura County

Post by subman »

Sorry, tried adding in my head. Just checked with the HP48gx and it is really 144-02-50 > than 135 degrees
Dennis Hunter, PLS & PE
Simi Valley, CA
PE_PLS
Posts: 216
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:00 pm

Orig Map

Post by PE_PLS »

Someone asked about the sub map, a portion of which is attached...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Jim Frame
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Post by Jim Frame »

I thought those street names sounded familiar! The site is about 2 miles from where I grew up, though in a neighborhood I rarely had cause to enter.

.
Jim Frame
Frame Surveying & Mapping
609 A Street
Davis, CA 95616
framesurveying.com
Anthony Maffia
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 4:52 pm
Location: Contra Costa County, CA

Post by Anthony Maffia »

I'm not sure what the answer is, but questions come to mind.

1. Were the lots merged legally or not? Planning may be wrong.

2. What stood on the parcel(s) prior to the fire?

3. Google Earth shows a concrete slab in the shape of a home. Did the city revoke a building permit?
http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/1066/pineneedle.jpg

4. I had a friend who lived half a block from there, tried to do something after the fire and the city said, "financial restrictions don't matter, if you can't afford to build there, then you shouldn't have bought the lot."

5. Special situations require that you talk to a supervising planner.
- Anthony Maffia, LSIT
Post Reply