Congratulations new Land Surveyors!
- Ian Wilson
- Posts: 1087
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 6:58 am
- Location: Bay Area
-
MikeTurnrose
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:41 am
Everstudy
I would not appeal. I appealed twice and found it to be a colossal waste of time and money. I never received a single point from the appeals. Maybe things have changed since 1998 when I passed. I don't know. My opinion is that time is better spent gearing up for next year (more study guides, classes, study groups, etc.).
-
JasonCamit
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:21 am
- Location: Fresno
- Contact:
Appeal without question
You may not get a single point. What you will get is detailed information. I was 4 points short and appealed, only to get 3 points. Sounds like a cruel joke, doesn't it. But I was able to see what I received points for. That information was what I used to study the next time around. I passed the following year confident with the subjects I received point for and prepared for the subjects that I did not receive points for. It takes a long time to prepare for the exams, but if you filter what you need to focus on it will 100% increase the value of your study time.
-
everstudy
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 9:58 am
-
bruce hall
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:18 pm
- Location: huntington beach, orange county, california
Well, I tell ya
what Everstudy. Count yourself fortunate that there is a venue 90 minutes away from your work, or real close thereto.(It takes me that long to drive from Huntington Beach to Tiajuana.)
If it was me who was you (not that you would want that, nor I), I would tell the boss that I needed to get off work an hour early in two weeks for the appeal class. I'd drive my tail down there, take the class, and drive back. Piece of cake, slice of pie.
Now if I didn't have a car, then I would probably try to take the train outa Fullerton or Santa Ana or SJC or San Clemente.
Now if I didn't have a car or I didn't have the money for a train ticket, but I had a horse(hopefully a saddle also), well then it's a whole different story then. And the reason being, I don't know how long it would take me to ride a horse to downtown San Diego or the TBD site. I might have to ask the boss for more time off.
Or take the suggestion by Mike Turnrose. Then you wouldn't have to deal with this 7 to 9 hour move from the OC to the SD. Like I said, count yourself fortunate that you have this opportunity, whether you take it or not.
If it was me who was you (not that you would want that, nor I), I would tell the boss that I needed to get off work an hour early in two weeks for the appeal class. I'd drive my tail down there, take the class, and drive back. Piece of cake, slice of pie.
Now if I didn't have a car, then I would probably try to take the train outa Fullerton or Santa Ana or SJC or San Clemente.
Now if I didn't have a car or I didn't have the money for a train ticket, but I had a horse(hopefully a saddle also), well then it's a whole different story then. And the reason being, I don't know how long it would take me to ride a horse to downtown San Diego or the TBD site. I might have to ask the boss for more time off.
Or take the suggestion by Mike Turnrose. Then you wouldn't have to deal with this 7 to 9 hour move from the OC to the SD. Like I said, count yourself fortunate that you have this opportunity, whether you take it or not.
Bruce Hall Land Surveyor No. 4743
5732 Middlecoff Drive
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
714 840 4380
5732 Middlecoff Drive
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
714 840 4380
-
bruce hall
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:18 pm
- Location: huntington beach, orange county, california
Atta Boy,
Ever! or is it Atta Girl?
Bruce Hall Land Surveyor No. 4743
5732 Middlecoff Drive
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
714 840 4380
5732 Middlecoff Drive
Huntington Beach, Ca. 92649
714 840 4380
-
E_Page
- Posts: 2144
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
- Location: El Dorado County
That's incredibly poor advice, Mike. Having seen the number of examinees who obtain their licenses through the appeals process, it appears not everyone was wasting their time as you did. I don't know what you were doing, but those guys and gals who were successful at appeals obviously made better use of their time there.MikeTurnrose wrote:I would not appeal. I appealed twice and found it to be a colossal waste of time and money. I never received a single point from the appeals. Maybe things have changed since 1998 when I passed. I don't know. My opinion is that time is better spent gearing up for next year (more study guides, classes, study groups, etc.).
It's too bad you didn't take the opportunity to use your first appeal experience to clue in on what graders were looking for and on what your weak points were rather than just looking at it as a point mining exercise.
Had you used that 1st appeal as a learning opportunity, you may not have had to go to that 2nd appeal.
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
A Visiting Forum Essayist
- NickL
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 11:42 am
- Location: Portland, OR
- Contact:
- BeachBum
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 12:24 pm
- Location: Santa Cruz
- Contact:
Appeal!!!
It would be a shame if you were close and did not appeal. At the very least, it will be the best study session you ever had. Unfortunately (or fortunately) they do not provide the “Answers†at the appeal session but you will plainly see where you made errors, and worst case scenario, be able to correct your actions next exam. In my experience, most of my errors stemmed from not understanding the question (taking it literal) and adding in my own assumptions. There is no trick except the one your mind plays on you during the exam!
I believe the Appeal process is a “group†effort … meaning, if a candidate has a plausible solution, states it clearly during the appeal, I believe others may benefit also if they had the same plausible solution, even though they may not have appealed the question. Please someone correct me if I am wrong. I was 17 points away when I appealed, and I don’t think I appealed everything perfectly, I believe another candidate helped me in his/her appeal, which was enough to put me over the edge. Just another assumption!
Good luck in your appeal, remember, be professional, and lead the graders down your logical path (following in the footsteps of your logic) proving to them you are worthy of becoming a Professional Land Surveyor.
I believe the Appeal process is a “group†effort … meaning, if a candidate has a plausible solution, states it clearly during the appeal, I believe others may benefit also if they had the same plausible solution, even though they may not have appealed the question. Please someone correct me if I am wrong. I was 17 points away when I appealed, and I don’t think I appealed everything perfectly, I believe another candidate helped me in his/her appeal, which was enough to put me over the edge. Just another assumption!
Good luck in your appeal, remember, be professional, and lead the graders down your logical path (following in the footsteps of your logic) proving to them you are worthy of becoming a Professional Land Surveyor.
Christopher Bateman
PLS 8091
PLS 8091
-
Rob_LS
- Posts: 375
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 4:56 pm
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
-
radicalfil
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:12 am
- Location: East Bay
Having spent most of the last week obsessively checking the BPELS license lookup, the first number issued this year was 8817. Whatever the last number is (8881?) does not jive with the statistics that were given as to how many candidates passed the State Specific exam, i.e. 65 vs 72.
I am just jazzed I didn't get a Dear Phil letter saying they made a terrible mistake. The official notice that was sent to me was a pretty low quality copy. I could barely read the Official Boards letter head. Must have been sent on furlough Friday.
pd
LS 8879 woohoo!
I am just jazzed I didn't get a Dear Phil letter saying they made a terrible mistake. The official notice that was sent to me was a pretty low quality copy. I could barely read the Official Boards letter head. Must have been sent on furlough Friday.
pd
LS 8879 woohoo!
- pls7809
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Chino, CA
-
radicalfil
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:12 am
- Location: East Bay
- pls7809
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Chino, CA
My theory is that the numbers are assigned by the order the exams are tossed in the pass pile. At one time I think they were assigned alphabetically, but not any more.
Contrary to some peoples' beliefs, I do not believe the order was ever determined by the score you received. If they wanted you to know how well you did they would have told you your score when you passed.
Contrary to some peoples' beliefs, I do not believe the order was ever determined by the score you received. If they wanted you to know how well you did they would have told you your score when you passed.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
-
radicalfil
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:12 am
- Location: East Bay