THERE SHOULD BE A WEBSITE COMMITTEE
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
THERE SHOULD BE A WEBSITE COMMITTEE
Upon pondering the recent discussions about the forum, a few things trouble me. Please note I have been out of town and engaged in other acts of Democracy that have consumed me so I haven't been involved. There seems to be a growing discord amongst forum users and they do not appear to be healthy. No matter what your feelings are, it is evident that the exchange of ideas is being discouraged and now, censored. Considering the forum is one of the benefits of the organization, why is it under attack?
I believe a committee should be formed to revisit the forum. The program itself is outdated and the intended uses never materialized. One of the things that is most striking is the fact that two thirds of the forums are not ever used. What does that say? The most active one is the General Discussion and that is the one under attack. What about the ones never used? This would indicated that whoever is administering the forum is either out of touch or not in tune with modern communication protocol. Why aren't these forums being used or why haven't they ever been used? One thing I do know (think MySpace) is if this is not worked out, a replacement will surface further impairing CLSA's standing in the land surveying community. Is that the goal here?
These forums are NEVER used.
CLSA Legislative Committee Members
This forum is for CLSA Legislative Committee Members only
CLSA Executive Committee
This forum is for CLSA Executive Committee Members only
CLSA PPC
This forum is for CLSA PPC Members only.
CLSA ATC
This forum is for CLSA Advanced Technology Committee members only
CLSA Education Committee
This forum is for CLSA Education Committee members only.
CLSA Past President's Committee
This forum is for CLSA Past President's only.
County Surveyor Forum
This password protected board is provided as a forum for County Surveyors and their staff
I believe a committee should be formed to revisit the forum. The program itself is outdated and the intended uses never materialized. One of the things that is most striking is the fact that two thirds of the forums are not ever used. What does that say? The most active one is the General Discussion and that is the one under attack. What about the ones never used? This would indicated that whoever is administering the forum is either out of touch or not in tune with modern communication protocol. Why aren't these forums being used or why haven't they ever been used? One thing I do know (think MySpace) is if this is not worked out, a replacement will surface further impairing CLSA's standing in the land surveying community. Is that the goal here?
These forums are NEVER used.
CLSA Legislative Committee Members
This forum is for CLSA Legislative Committee Members only
CLSA Executive Committee
This forum is for CLSA Executive Committee Members only
CLSA PPC
This forum is for CLSA PPC Members only.
CLSA ATC
This forum is for CLSA Advanced Technology Committee members only
CLSA Education Committee
This forum is for CLSA Education Committee members only.
CLSA Past President's Committee
This forum is for CLSA Past President's only.
County Surveyor Forum
This password protected board is provided as a forum for County Surveyors and their staff
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
RAM
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
- Location: Central Cal Mountains
I am not sure what the Intended use was, but for me, the forum is a BIG benefit. Being in a rural area and located between local chapters this is my main contact with my peers. The sharing of ideas, whether I agree or not, allows me to keep things in perspective. AS to the Co. Surveyors forum not being used, that is incorrect. We use it and I rely about it for share ideas and resolve issues. I can post a single question and receive 58 responses.
I agree people need to be sensitive to others and respective. Overall this forum is a useful tool that needs to stay in place.
Just my 2 cents.
I agree people need to be sensitive to others and respective. Overall this forum is a useful tool that needs to stay in place.
Just my 2 cents.
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
Never used?
Please see the attached. Is this true or not?
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- pls7809
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Chino, CA
-
E_Page
- Posts: 2144
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
- Location: El Dorado County
Most of those other forums do get some use, although not a lot. The Indicators of "Never" for last post, and the zeros for numbers of posts and threads are misleading. If you are logged in with the appropriate committee password, you can see the actual number of existing threads & posts, as well as the most recent thread title, poster, and date/time posted, just as with the other forums.
I have some opinions about the new rules, but am thinking it over a while before I post them. Like with most other matters for which there strong opinions, both sides have valid points, and those points need to be recognized to make discussion meaningful and potentially productive.
I have some opinions about the new rules, but am thinking it over a while before I post them. Like with most other matters for which there strong opinions, both sides have valid points, and those points need to be recognized to make discussion meaningful and potentially productive.
Evan Page, PLS
A Visiting Forum Essayist
A Visiting Forum Essayist
- land butcher
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
- Location: calif
Why do public employees get a Private Forum, isn't govt supposed to be transparent?
What I have read of the rules can only be considered Censorship.
What I have read of the rules can only be considered Censorship.
Interesting, not the way I heard it. Of course I'm old so maybe I missed a word or two, to, too.because the Board of Directors (not the executive board, rather YOUR chapter's representatives) has directed
Defund govt
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
-
Jay Wright
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:39 am
-
E_Page
- Posts: 2144
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 6:49 am
- Location: El Dorado County
- land butcher
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
- Location: calif
Why?CLSA provides it for them as a courtesy.
Defund govt
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
-
MFORD
Access to closed committee forums
M Pallamary asked the same question of these forums that I recently asked of the incoming CLSA President. Why can’t these forums be accessed by the general membership? I understand the need for the committee members to be able to openly discuss the details of the issues and topics the different committees are charged with. I also know the non committee, general membership can attend the committee meetings as observers. So why restrict the membership from viewing the postings on the committee forums?
[font="]What would be the harm in letting the general membership “view†the discussions without the ability to contribute. These committees are ostensibly making decisions and advising the BOD on matters that affect the entire surveying profession, not just CLSA members. It would benefit everyone to know the rational and reasoning for the decisions the committees arrive at. It may even encourage more participation and involvement by members that otherwise feel alienated by the atmosphere of secrecy that currently surrounds the BOD.[/font]
[font="]What would be the harm in letting the general membership “view†the discussions without the ability to contribute. These committees are ostensibly making decisions and advising the BOD on matters that affect the entire surveying profession, not just CLSA members. It would benefit everyone to know the rational and reasoning for the decisions the committees arrive at. It may even encourage more participation and involvement by members that otherwise feel alienated by the atmosphere of secrecy that currently surrounds the BOD.[/font]
-
mpallamary
- Posts: 3466
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:12 pm
- land butcher
- Posts: 1615
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
- Location: calif
In secret? What are they discussing that the taxpayers can't know about?RAM wrote:to freely exchange information, ideas and issues
Defund govt
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?