Bazaar Exception in a description

Post Reply
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Bizarre Exception in a description

Post by pls7809 »

Here's a new one for me:

Excepting therefrom, the Oak Trees now standing on the land above described, as reserved by (some bank), in the deed recorded June 11, 1898, in ... of deeds...
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
User avatar
Scott Tikalsky
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 2:36 pm
Location: Redding, Ca.

Post by Scott Tikalsky »

Well, the price of oak firewood keeps going up. :)
Scott Tikalsky, L.S.
Redding, Ca.
530.440.5046
Warren Smith
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Sonora

Post by Warren Smith »

The Oaks could have been shade for the Bazaar ...

Bizarre ...

:-)
Warren D. Smith, LS 4842
County Surveyor Emeritus
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

Thanks Warren. That didn't look right to me and now I know why.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
User avatar
Dave Karoly, PLS
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 6:26 pm
Location: Sacramento

Post by Dave Karoly, PLS »

Gladding-McBean in Lincoln purchased and burned up a lot of Oak trees. They are a vitrified clay plant.
"Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines." -General "Buck" Turgidson
Anthony Maffia
Posts: 530
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 4:52 pm
Location: Contra Costa County, CA

Post by Anthony Maffia »

I learned this in a RE class I took around 2006. Sales of agricultural lands can exclude the next harvest - fruit, crops, etc.

Perhaps the seller was planning on cutting down the oaks as timber?
- Anthony Maffia, LSIT
Dave Sigman
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:32 am
Location: Sacramento

Post by Dave Sigman »

As I understand it, crops in the field and harvested timber aren't considered part of the land but growing timber is. Maybe the owner just had a sentimental attachment to the trees and didn't want to see them cut down.
Dave Sigman
LS 8319
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

The reservation was to a bank, so it was probably some kind of commodity they were going to cut and sell. Maybe part of the deal that was made back then to pay off a loan or something.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

may also have to do with a condition for Oak Tree mitigation.
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

I would be surprised if mitigation was the reason in 1898.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
Dave Sigman
Posts: 31
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2011 10:32 am
Location: Sacramento

Post by Dave Sigman »

Since it was to the bank it was probably part of the collateral the bank took for the loan to buy the property... just thinking out loud.
Dave Sigman
LS 8319
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

I took it as a reference to a prior deed in 1898, describing the current lands, subject to. I can see 2 or 3 interpretations based on the info given.
Post Reply