Adverse Possession Against Public Property

Post Reply
Warren Smith
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Sonora

Adverse Possession Against Public Property

Post by Warren Smith »

I recall a question about the origin of this concept.

Here is the opinion in Headley v. San Francisco, 50 Cal. 265 (1875) where the Court wove together the applicable principles:
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Warren D. Smith, LS 4842
County Surveyor Emeritus
User avatar
Steve Martin
Posts: 632
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:24 pm
Location: Hayward

Re: Adverse Possession Against Public Property

Post by Steve Martin »

CA Civil Code

1007.

Occupancy for the period prescribed by the Code of Civil Procedure as sufficient to bar any action for the recovery of the property confers a title thereto, denominated a title by prescription, which is sufficient against all, but no possession by any person, firm or corporation no matter how long continued of any land, water, water right, easement, or other property whatsoever dedicated to a public use by a public utility, or dedicated to or owned by the state or any public entity, shall ever ripen into any title, interest or right against the owner thereof.


(Amended by Stats. 1968, Ch. 1112.)
Warren Smith
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Sonora

Re: Adverse Possession Against Public Property

Post by Warren Smith »

And that's an instance of the legislature enacting statutes declaratory of the common law. It has evolved into water rights as well.
Warren D. Smith, LS 4842
County Surveyor Emeritus
Post Reply