Implied-in-fact dedication case

[steffan]

Newly published appellate decision expanding on the recent Scher v Burke decision:

[goodgps]

Wow. Thank you.
This case may assist a property owner who has been using a proposed irrigation easement for many years. The proposed easement was shown in a parcel map but never formally accepted or otherwise documented. Suddenly a new property owner of the encumbered parcel decided to close the irrigation ditch and lock out the users.
The new owners attorney called the users of the easement telling them not to trespass anymore.

[steffan]

GoodGPS, I don’t know. I have a different impression of this case’s applicability to your sitution. But then again, I’ve been wrong before.