Adverse Possession

Post Reply
User avatar
land butcher
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
Location: calif

Adverse Possession

Post by land butcher »

Housing tract in So Cal built in mid 1970s.
Woman (A) contacts me about a lot survey for the house she just bought.
Neighbor (B) having lived there an unknown number of years states "The wall is X ft onto my property and you can't touch it".

Unknown surveyor tells Woman (A) that (B) has given up the property on (A's) side of the wall thru adverse possession.

How many on here agree with the surveyor that B lost the property on A's side thru adverse possession?
BoundaryMan
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:44 pm

Post by BoundaryMan »

I disagree that B lost the property on A’s side thru adverse procession. There are several requirements which must be met in order for property to gained by adverse possession; namely: 1) possession must be open & notorious. 2) possession must be actual. 3) must be continuous for statutory period. Must be hostile. 4) must be exclusive.
Finally you must prove said 4 items in court who has the final decision. It’s not an easy task to gain property thru adverse possession.
My 2 cents.
LS 4722
Posts: 479
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:42 am

Neighbor B was right

Post by LS 4722 »

Neighbor (B)... states "The wall is X ft onto my property and you can't touch it".
She says it's over line and it would be against the law to touch it (Remove) without a court order.

Unknown surveyor needs to keep his mouth shut..
User avatar
Ian Wilson
Posts: 1087
Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2002 6:58 am
Location: Bay Area

Post by Ian Wilson »

Please read Government Code §323 and §325 for statutory conditions for AP.

Note that §325 requires proof of payment of taxes on the disputed area for a minumum of five years. This can be difficultto prove in a mapped subdivision.

While a wonderful tool to clear title, AP isincredibly poorly understood, even by those of who ought to know better.

What a pity that a surveyor with so poor a knowledge of the subject has now cause such great harm between neighbors.
Ian Wilson, P.L.S. (CA / NV / CO)
Alameda County Surveyor
User avatar
land butcher
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
Location: calif

Post by land butcher »

I believe there is one more requirement - person seeking adverse possession has to have paid taxes on the disputed land.

My response to her was "Adverse possession - dream on. not gonna happen". She doesn't want it anyway.
And it would require one lot to probably not meet required setbacks and/or minimum lot size.
User avatar
land butcher
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
Location: calif

Post by land butcher »

Ian and I were typing the same thing at the same time.
Post Reply