Palo Alto benchmarks

Post Reply
MikeTurnrose
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:41 am

Palo Alto benchmarks

Post by MikeTurnrose »

The City of Palo Alto published a benchmark list in 1993 which is pretty extensive. However, the datum is on NGVD 29. The City did not adjust the elevations to NAVD 88 that I know of when FEMA redid the FIRMS in 2009. Has anyone used the BMs recently there for an El Cert and converted to NAVD 88 using VERTCON? If so, what was your feeling about the reliability of converting? Thanks.
User avatar
sako
Posts: 323
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 9:40 am
Location: Bay Area

Post by sako »

MikeTurnrose wrote:The City of Palo Alto published a benchmark list in 1993 which is pretty extensive. However, the datum is on NGVD 29. The City did not adjust the elevations to NAVD 88 that I know of when FEMA redid the FIRMS in 2009. Has anyone used the BMs recently there for an El Cert and converted to NAVD 88 using VERTCON? If so, what was your feeling about the reliability of converting? Thanks.
I used vertcon to convert the BM to NAVD88. The city provided me with an elevation 0.1' higher than what the software did. Ironically, the 0.1' difference got the FF at BFE.
btaylor
Posts: 501
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:33 pm
Location: Foster City, CA

Post by btaylor »

I have seen Vertcon, at least in the areas I work here in the Bay Area, to be pretty accurate.
Bryan G. Taylor, LS 7551
871 Woodside Way
San Mateo, CA 94401

btaylor@bgtsurveying.com
User avatar
land butcher
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
Location: calif

Post by land butcher »

A few years ago Vertcon was described as "use only for topo".
I am not sure if going to different areas would effect the results, but I would test vertcon on agency published bms in both 29 and 88 such as Orange County and LA County.
Defund govt
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
User avatar
land butcher
Posts: 1615
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 7:26 pm
Location: calif

Post by land butcher »

sako wrote:I used vertcon to convert the BM to NAVD88. The city provided me with an elevation 0.1' higher than what the software did. Ironically, the 0.1' difference got the FF at BFE.
That's scary
Defund govt
To fully fund govt first the national debt would have to be paid. The US Govt is $18 TRILLION in debt, using 350 million people in the USA it would require $51,000 from every man, woman and child to pay it off. And that's just the Federal debt. Did you write your check yet?
MikeTurnrose
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 9:41 am

benchmarks

Post by MikeTurnrose »

Thanks for your input everyone.

I have had pretty decent results with VERTCON the few times I've used it also.
User avatar
PLS7393
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Bay Area (Fremont)
Contact:

Post by PLS7393 »

VERTCON is the only conversion tool I use, as it is clean and easy.
Two rules of thumb:
1) Some use GPS to transfer and establish elevations (+/- 0.1') elevations
2) FEMA Elevation Certs only want 0.1' accuracy

So using VERTCON is right in line with acceptable tolerances.
Keith Nofield, Professional Land Surveying
PLS 7393
Post Reply