Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments

Post Reply
User avatar
Lee Hixson
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Yuba City, CA
Contact:

Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments

Post by Lee Hixson »

I've always assumed that they were all the same size and length. Is that true? Seems that I was told once that they were 30" long. Can anyone verify that for me?
R. Lee Hixson, PLS 4806

"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
User avatar
Dave Karoly, PLS
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 6:26 pm
Location: Sacramento

Post by Dave Karoly, PLS »

I found some of those lying on the ground in Rincon, San Diego County (never set). Memory is they were 4' long.
"Gee, I wish we had one of them doomsday machines." -General "Buck" Turgidson
User avatar
Mr. Smith
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:44 am
Location: Montague CA
Contact:

Post by Mr. Smith »

Northern CA
Seen different lengths, also some have a steel rod wire
on the top (which I would measure to), others do not.
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Post by pls7809 »

It's cool that I can see a couple of these concrete monuments sticking out of the ground next to the RW fence corners while driving southbound on Hwy. 71, just north of the 91 in Corona/Chino area.
Ryan Versteeg, PLS, CFedS
Johnston
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:46 am

It varies?

Post by Johnston »

I have some Humboldt County area 1951 highway plans that show 3'-6". I don't know if these were supplied to contractors by the State, or built by the contractor. Either way, there I guess there could be variation. Caltrans surveyors should be able to pull up as-builts or give you some insight on your particular location.
User avatar
Lee Hixson
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Yuba City, CA
Contact:

Post by Lee Hixson »

Johnston: the trouble is Caltrans has absolutely nothing, no maps, no field notes, to document the two CHC mons we've found. Flying kind of blind here.
R. Lee Hixson, PLS 4806

"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
RAM
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:16 am
Location: Central Cal Mountains

Post by RAM »

someplace I have a spec sheet of the old monuments, I will try to find, but from memory, 36" long was the standard.
PLS8153
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:06 am
Location: Humboldt County

Spec Sheet for Concrete Mons

Post by PLS8153 »

I have an AS-Build sheet that shows the monuments. They are 3' 6" with a 3/16 copper wire that is 6" long. I got this from a District 1 Surveyor. He told me that the contractor often fabricated them on site using these spec sheets. Hope this helps, it is a little hard to read.

Pete
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
JLG3RD
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed May 28, 2003 9:33 am

"C" Mon

Post by JLG3RD »

Attached is a paper that talk more in depth of the "C" mon and it's use.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Jim Frame
Posts: 1599
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Post by Jim Frame »

with a 3/16 copper wire that is 6" long
I came across a CHC monument on West Capitol Avenue in West Sacramento that was broken off at the top. The exposed part of the copper wire was at least 8" long, and it was still anchored in the undisturbed portion of the monument below. I think the 6" wire length specification was a minimum rather than a no-more-no-less requirement.
Jim Frame
Frame Surveying & Mapping
609 A Street
Davis, CA 95616
framesurveying.com
User avatar
Scott Tikalsky
Posts: 94
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 2:36 pm
Location: Redding, Ca.

Post by Scott Tikalsky »

Good Morning Lee;

Give me a call. Maybe I can help you out.

510-286-5267
Scott Tikalsky, L.S.
Redding, Ca.
530.440.5046
Johnston
Posts: 43
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:46 am

Thanks JLG3rd

Post by Johnston »

Thanks for the paper on use of C-Mons. Do you know which district this came out of, and if those pre-1967 procedures were followed state wide? For any retracement survey that paper is a good reminder that there might be a convoluted history of measurements of varying accuracies that resulted in that original monument in the ground.
mbstanton
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 9:44 am

6x6 concrete monuments (Cal Trans)

Post by mbstanton »

Here is a detail of the 6x6 monument from the state and a monument article from 1914.
The article was published by the California Highway Commission in the
"CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY BULLETIN VOLUME II JULY 1, 1914 NUMBER 1"
The detail of the 6x6 was taken randomly from as built plans.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
mbstanton
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 9:44 am

6x6 monument detail

Post by mbstanton »

forgot attachment!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Lee Hixson
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Yuba City, CA
Contact:

Post by Lee Hixson »

I thank you all for your comments and especially for the articles and sketches. Looks like the weight of opinion is that they were 3'6" long, buried with 6" exposed. With the caveat that, since contractors were often involved in the setting of the monuments, adjustments could have been made in the field.
R. Lee Hixson, PLS 4806

"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
User avatar
PLS7393
Posts: 949
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Bay Area (Fremont)
Contact:

Post by PLS7393 »

Working for Caltrans for 6.5 years, and my involvement with the Mount Diablo Surveyors Historical Society, in my quest for information on Caltrans C-Mons several years ago, these were not always set by a survey crew, rather engineers as references for "Construction Monuments". They may or may not be accurate, so be cautious.
Keith Nofield, Professional Land Surveying
PLS 7393
User avatar
Lee Hixson
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Yuba City, CA
Contact:

Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments

Post by Lee Hixson »

Does anyone know who JLG3RD is? I've been trying, unsuccessfully, to contact him as I would like to know where his attachment ("Addendum to Chapter 6") came from. I think it is a valuable document but what's the source? For some reason my attempts to send him a "private message" will not go through. He hasn't responded.
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments

Post by pls7809 »

Any chance anyone has those attachments and can put them up again? It looks like the attachments aren't available anymore.
User avatar
Lee Hixson
Posts: 577
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
Location: Yuba City, CA
Contact:

Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments

Post by Lee Hixson »

Here are the docs I saved from this thread last year. Note that I am told that the "Addendum to Chapter 6" was authored by a Caltrans Surveyor as part of an in-house training session.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
pls7809
Posts: 1035
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
Location: Chino, CA

Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments

Post by pls7809 »

Thanks for reposting them. Valuable info to have.
Post Reply