Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments
I've always assumed that they were all the same size and length. Is that true? Seems that I was told once that they were 30" long. Can anyone verify that for me?
R. Lee Hixson, PLS 4806
"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
- Dave Karoly, PLS
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Aug 30, 2002 6:26 pm
- Location: Sacramento
- Mr. Smith
- Posts: 225
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:44 am
- Location: Montague CA
- Contact:
- pls7809
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Chino, CA
-
Johnston
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:46 am
It varies?
I have some Humboldt County area 1951 highway plans that show 3'-6". I don't know if these were supplied to contractors by the State, or built by the contractor. Either way, there I guess there could be variation. Caltrans surveyors should be able to pull up as-builts or give you some insight on your particular location.
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
-
PLS8153
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2007 9:06 am
- Location: Humboldt County
Spec Sheet for Concrete Mons
I have an AS-Build sheet that shows the monuments. They are 3' 6" with a 3/16 copper wire that is 6" long. I got this from a District 1 Surveyor. He told me that the contractor often fabricated them on site using these spec sheets. Hope this helps, it is a little hard to read.
Pete
Pete
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Jim Frame
- Posts: 1599
- Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2002 8:52 pm
- Location: Davis, CA
- Contact:
I came across a CHC monument on West Capitol Avenue in West Sacramento that was broken off at the top. The exposed part of the copper wire was at least 8" long, and it was still anchored in the undisturbed portion of the monument below. I think the 6" wire length specification was a minimum rather than a no-more-no-less requirement.with a 3/16 copper wire that is 6" long
- Scott Tikalsky
- Posts: 94
- Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 2:36 pm
- Location: Redding, Ca.
-
Johnston
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:46 am
Thanks JLG3rd
Thanks for the paper on use of C-Mons. Do you know which district this came out of, and if those pre-1967 procedures were followed state wide? For any retracement survey that paper is a good reminder that there might be a convoluted history of measurements of varying accuracies that resulted in that original monument in the ground.
-
mbstanton
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 9:44 am
6x6 concrete monuments (Cal Trans)
Here is a detail of the 6x6 monument from the state and a monument article from 1914.
The article was published by the California Highway Commission in the
"CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY BULLETIN VOLUME II JULY 1, 1914 NUMBER 1"
The detail of the 6x6 was taken randomly from as built plans.
The article was published by the California Highway Commission in the
"CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY BULLETIN VOLUME II JULY 1, 1914 NUMBER 1"
The detail of the 6x6 was taken randomly from as built plans.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
mbstanton
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 9:44 am
6x6 monument detail
forgot attachment!
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
I thank you all for your comments and especially for the articles and sketches. Looks like the weight of opinion is that they were 3'6" long, buried with 6" exposed. With the caveat that, since contractors were often involved in the setting of the monuments, adjustments could have been made in the field.
R. Lee Hixson, PLS 4806
"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
"Brevity without uncertainty or ambiguity"
- PLS7393
- Posts: 949
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 2:09 pm
- Location: Bay Area (Fremont)
- Contact:
Working for Caltrans for 6.5 years, and my involvement with the Mount Diablo Surveyors Historical Society, in my quest for information on Caltrans C-Mons several years ago, these were not always set by a survey crew, rather engineers as references for "Construction Monuments". They may or may not be accurate, so be cautious.
Keith Nofield, Professional Land Surveying
PLS 7393
PLS 7393
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments
Does anyone know who JLG3RD is? I've been trying, unsuccessfully, to contact him as I would like to know where his attachment ("Addendum to Chapter 6") came from. I think it is a valuable document but what's the source? For some reason my attempts to send him a "private message" will not go through. He hasn't responded.
- pls7809
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Chino, CA
Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments
Any chance anyone has those attachments and can put them up again? It looks like the attachments aren't available anymore.
- Lee Hixson
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 8:03 am
- Location: Yuba City, CA
- Contact:
Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments
Here are the docs I saved from this thread last year. Note that I am told that the "Addendum to Chapter 6" was authored by a Caltrans Surveyor as part of an in-house training session.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
- pls7809
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Chino, CA
Re: Caltrans 6x6 CHC Monuments
Thanks for reposting them. Valuable info to have.